UK: +44 (0)1243 860893 
USA:+1 (470) 828-4689
Oracle migrations rely on structure. Project teams need clear workstreams, accurate data, defined configuration, testing cycles and a reliable cutover plan. But even with that structure in place, indirect tax can add a layer of complexity that is easy to underestimate. It sits at the centre of everyday transaction
ERP migrations are often driven by the need for better data, improved controls and long-term scalability. Yet one critical area is still too often treated as an afterthought, tax. When tax is not properly considered during an ERP migration, the consequences can be expensive, time-consuming
ERP migrations remain a major priority for organisations modernising their finance and operational systems. As these programmes continue into 2026, indirect tax is emerging as one of the most complex and risk exposed areas of change. While new ERP platforms promise improved automation and control,
Belgium’s move to mandatory structured B2B e-invoicing from 1 January 2026 is often described as a compliance milestone. In reality, it signals something much broader, a structural shift in how VAT is controlled, validated and enforced across Europe. For businesses operating complex ERP environments or
E-invoicing was formally announced back in November as part of the government’s wider plans to modernise the UK’s tax and business environment. At the time, it signalled intent, a clear indication that structured electronic invoicing would play a central role in the next phase of
If the PDF below doesn’t show on your browser, view it here.
Test your knowledge of the indirect tax landscape in our Christmas VAT crossword. From the details of the proposed ViDA reforms to your knowledge of everything from imports to VAT returns, we hope you enjoy the challenge! If you click assist>check grid and it stays
